Regarding those of you upset by this ruling, I wonder: How does it feel to be on the trailing edge of progress, or, if you will, on the wrong side of history? For those of you old enough to remember, how did you feel about the legalization of interracial marriage? Or school integration? Or public accommodations being required to serve people of all races? Conservatives opposed all of these changes, blaming them on an "activist judiciary," and predicted dire consequences. Do you believe now, decades later, that those enormous changes in "what was and always would be" have disintegrated the fabric of society? Do you believe the apocalyptic changes predicted by their opponents have taken place? Conservatives, by their very nature (and by definition ), desire to preserve the status quo. I can think of three underlying reasons for such a desire: 1) Fear of the unknown. (Things may not be great now, but at least we KNOW how they are -- but if we change some...
This week, the Supreme Court ruled in the Hobby Lobby case. Everyone should be concerned and upset about this ruling, especially women. Reproductive Rights and Equality for Women I'm still in my 40's, so I can't claim to be a groundbreaking feminist, though I have had to fight for equality a few times. But mostly, the heavy lifting was done before I came along. I grew up expecting my reproductive rights to be there. By the time it affected me, Roe v. Wade was old news. I took an interesting medical ethics class in college, and we studied the law and controversy around abortion, around things like frozen embryos, cloning, etc. It was one of my favorite classes. (I took it the same quarter I took a logic class -- and I think the combination of the two proved very beneficial for my ability to analyze an argument!) The problem, as I see it, is that these same arguments continue today. I'm a bit shaken because this is supposed to be se...
Today I called my representative about the health care reform bill. It's not perfect. In some ways, it's not even good. But once it is passed, health insurance companies won't be able to take your money for years and then dump you as soon as you actually get sick, or pretend that the acne you had when you were 14 is a "pre-existing condition" that makes you uninsurable when you get cervical cancer 40 years later. I don't see how passing this can be, on balance, a bad thing. Then I went to said representative's Facebook page, and was appalled. For the last few days, the majority of posts were certainly in support of a yes vote (which would be a change, since this Congress-critter voted "no" in the last round). But those who didn't support it were impassioned, angry, terrified, and horribly misinformed. I've argued politics regularly with some of the same people for about a decade. The recent rhetoric is the least grounded in fact an...
Comments
Post a Comment